Pffffffffffft : Sorry for the noise. All is  explained in documentation 
http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/adk15notebook/annotations-declar
e.html

Cordialement / Best regards

Jean-Louis Pasturel


  _____  

De : aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org
[mailto:aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org] De la part de
jeanlouis.pastu...@orange-ftgroup.com
Envoyé : mardi 23 novembre 2010 08:19
À : aspectj-users@eclipse.org
Objet : [aspectj-users] aspectj joinpoint *for* Annotation ?


is there a mean to weave and overload an annotation with AspectJ LTW ?
 
It would be interesting, for example to test with LTW weaving  ORM (
Hibernate for fetching plan / strategy  => lazy, eager) or caching policy (
Entirty/query cachable or not)  when annotations are used instead of XML
files and we have not the source code and the IDE to modify / re-compile
code. Useful in stressing tests to optimize configurations.
 

Cordialement / Best regards



Jean-Louis Pasturel


*********************************

This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and
intended solely for the addressees. 

Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited.

Messages are susceptible to alteration. 

France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed
or falsified.

If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it
immediately and inform the sender.

********************************


*********************************
This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended 
solely for the addressees. 
Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited.
Messages are susceptible to alteration. 
France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or 
falsified.
If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it 
immediately and inform the sender.
********************************

_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users

Reply via email to