Not sure what kind of matching you want to do (kind of joinpoint, kind of annotation value). If I understand what you mean, there is already some support for this, see the "annotation value matching" section in (this is execution joinpoint, enum annotation value):
http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/README-160.html optimized binding of values is in: http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/README-161.html cheers, Andy 2010/11/23 Henrique Rebêlo <h...@cin.ufpe.br>: > Hi Andy and all, > > Enjoying the subject of join points and annotations, > > I want to know if there is a possibility to match an annotated join point > based on its property. However, without using the if pointcut... > > Thanks, > > Henrique > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Andy Clement <andrew.clem...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Annotation: >> >> - augmenting (new values in existing annotations) >> - replacing (of annotations/annotation values) >> - removal of annotations >> >> are all candidate features. >> >> First two are here: >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=313026 >> >> Haven't quite raised the bugzilla for the third yet, but might do the >> work under that existing 313026. >> >> I'm seeing an increasing number of use cases for these features so >> they aren't too far away. >> >> cheers, >> Andy >> >> On 23 November 2010 01:07, Frank Pavageau <frank.pavag...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Note that you can't modify an existing annotation, which would be >> > quite useful in that context : changing the cache strategy between >> > read-write and read-only for example (even if you have the source, >> > different usage patterns can use different strategies on the same >> > entities), or the fetching strategy indeed. It would be a useful >> > AspectJ improvement IMHO, but there might be issues which explain why >> > it's not possible. Maybe Andy (or someone else) can shed some light on >> > it. >> > >> > Frank >> > >> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, >> > <jeanlouis.pastu...@orange-ftgroup.com> wrote: >> >> Pffffffffffft : Sorry for the noise. All is explained in documentation >> >> >> >> http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/adk15notebook/annotations-declare.html >> >> >> >> Cordialement / Best regards >> >> >> >> Jean-Louis Pasturel >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> De : aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org >> >> [mailto:aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org] De la part de >> >> jeanlouis.pastu...@orange-ftgroup.com >> >> Envoyé : mardi 23 novembre 2010 08:19 >> >> À : aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> >> Objet : [aspectj-users] aspectj joinpoint *for* Annotation ? >> >> >> >> is there a mean to weave and overload an annotation with AspectJ LTW ? >> >> >> >> It would be interesting, for example to test with LTW weaving ORM ( >> >> Hibernate for fetching plan / strategy => lazy, eager) or caching >> >> policy >> >> ( Entirty/query cachable or not) when annotations are used instead of >> >> XML >> >> files and we have not the source code and the IDE to modify / >> >> re-compile >> >> code. Useful in stressing tests to optimize configurations. >> >> >> >> >> >> Cordialement / Best regards >> >> >> >> Jean-Louis Pasturel >> >> >> >> ********************************* >> >> This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and >> >> intended solely for the addressees. >> >> Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. >> >> Messages are susceptible to alteration. >> >> France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, >> >> changed >> >> or falsified. >> >> If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it >> >> immediately and inform the sender. >> >> ******************************** >> >> >> >> ********************************* >> >> This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and >> >> intended solely for the addressees. >> >> Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. >> >> Messages are susceptible to alteration. >> >> France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, >> >> changed >> >> or falsified. >> >> If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it >> >> immediately and inform the sender. >> >> ******************************** >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> aspectj-users mailing list >> >> aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > aspectj-users mailing list >> > aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > > > -- > ............................................................................................................................... > Henrique Rebelo > http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~hemr > Informatics Center, UFPE, Brazil > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > aspectj-users@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
