Hi Andy, There is just one more question regarding annotation issue.
I know that we can use supply annotations to methods such as: declare @method: @myAnnotation * *(..): @otherOne; My question is: Can we attach an annotation to a particular advice in which was previously marked? For example, assume we have a method m() and a around advice marked with the @my Annotation. So, the above syntax will affects only the method m()... My conjecture is that it is supposed to attach any method-like including advice. Thanks, Henrique 2010/11/23 Henrique Rebêlo <h...@cin.ufpe.br> > Hi Andy, > > thanks for your valuable comments and suggestions. > > > No, you can't use @withincode like that. It is not an unreasonable >> requirement, so raise a bugzilla if you'd like to see it in the >> future. >> > > OK. I'll > > Kind Regards, > > Henrique > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Andy Clement > <andrew.clem...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> No, you can't use @withincode like that. It is not an unreasonable >> requirement, so raise a bugzilla if you'd like to see it in the >> future. >> >> cheers >> Andy >> >> 2010/11/23 Henrique Rebêlo <h...@cin.ufpe.br>: >> > Hi Andy and all, >> > >> > Yes, this documentation is helpful! Thanks. >> > >> > One more thing: Can I specify a property based matching by using a >> > @withincode or @annotation? >> > >> > For example: We can have >> > >> > execution(@Trace !...@trace(TraceLevel.NONE) * *(..)) >> > >> > So, Can we use in a similar way when using a @ withincode for instance? >> > >> > Something like: @withincode(Trace(Tracel.Level.NONE)) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Henrique >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Andy Clement <andrew.clem...@gmail.com >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Not sure what kind of matching you want to do (kind of joinpoint, kind >> >> of annotation value). If I understand what you mean, there is already >> >> some support for this, see the "annotation value matching" section in >> >> (this is execution joinpoint, enum annotation value): >> >> >> >> http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/README-160.html >> >> >> >> optimized binding of values is in: >> >> http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/README-161.html >> >> >> >> cheers, >> >> Andy >> >> >> >> 2010/11/23 Henrique Rebêlo <h...@cin.ufpe.br>: >> >> > Hi Andy and all, >> >> > >> >> > Enjoying the subject of join points and annotations, >> >> > >> >> > I want to know if there is a possibility to match an annotated join >> >> > point >> >> > based on its property. However, without using the if pointcut... >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > >> >> > Henrique >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Andy Clement < >> andrew.clem...@gmail.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Annotation: >> >> >> >> >> >> - augmenting (new values in existing annotations) >> >> >> - replacing (of annotations/annotation values) >> >> >> - removal of annotations >> >> >> >> >> >> are all candidate features. >> >> >> >> >> >> First two are here: >> >> >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=313026 >> >> >> >> >> >> Haven't quite raised the bugzilla for the third yet, but might do >> the >> >> >> work under that existing 313026. >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm seeing an increasing number of use cases for these features so >> >> >> they aren't too far away. >> >> >> >> >> >> cheers, >> >> >> Andy >> >> >> >> >> >> On 23 November 2010 01:07, Frank Pavageau <frank.pavag...@gmail.com >> > >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Note that you can't modify an existing annotation, which would be >> >> >> > quite useful in that context : changing the cache strategy between >> >> >> > read-write and read-only for example (even if you have the source, >> >> >> > different usage patterns can use different strategies on the same >> >> >> > entities), or the fetching strategy indeed. It would be a useful >> >> >> > AspectJ improvement IMHO, but there might be issues which explain >> why >> >> >> > it's not possible. Maybe Andy (or someone else) can shed some >> light >> >> >> > on >> >> >> > it. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Frank >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, >> >> >> > <jeanlouis.pastu...@orange-ftgroup.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Pffffffffffft : Sorry for the noise. All is explained in >> >> >> >> documentation >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/adk15notebook/annotations-declare.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cordialement / Best regards >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Jean-Louis Pasturel >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> >> >> De : aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org >> >> >> >> [mailto:aspectj-users-boun...@eclipse.org] De la part de >> >> >> >> jeanlouis.pastu...@orange-ftgroup.com >> >> >> >> Envoyé : mardi 23 novembre 2010 08:19 >> >> >> >> À : aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> >> >> >> Objet : [aspectj-users] aspectj joinpoint *for* Annotation ? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> is there a mean to weave and overload an annotation with AspectJ >> >> >> >> LTW ? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It would be interesting, for example to test with LTW weaving >> ORM ( >> >> >> >> Hibernate for fetching plan / strategy => lazy, eager) or >> caching >> >> >> >> policy >> >> >> >> ( Entirty/query cachable or not) when annotations are used >> instead >> >> >> >> of >> >> >> >> XML >> >> >> >> files and we have not the source code and the IDE to modify / >> >> >> >> re-compile >> >> >> >> code. Useful in stressing tests to optimize configurations. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cordialement / Best regards >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Jean-Louis Pasturel >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ********************************* >> >> >> >> This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential >> >> >> >> and >> >> >> >> intended solely for the addressees. >> >> >> >> Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. >> >> >> >> Messages are susceptible to alteration. >> >> >> >> France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if >> altered, >> >> >> >> changed >> >> >> >> or falsified. >> >> >> >> If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please >> cancel >> >> >> >> it >> >> >> >> immediately and inform the sender. >> >> >> >> ******************************** >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ********************************* >> >> >> >> This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential >> >> >> >> and >> >> >> >> intended solely for the addressees. >> >> >> >> Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. >> >> >> >> Messages are susceptible to alteration. >> >> >> >> France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if >> altered, >> >> >> >> changed >> >> >> >> or falsified. >> >> >> >> If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please >> cancel >> >> >> >> it >> >> >> >> immediately and inform the sender. >> >> >> >> ******************************** >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> >> aspectj-users mailing list >> >> >> >> aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> >> >> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >> > aspectj-users mailing list >> >> >> > aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> >> >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> >> >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> aspectj-users mailing list >> >> >> aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> >> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > >> >> > >> ............................................................................................................................... >> >> > Henrique Rebelo >> >> > http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~hemr <http://www.cin.ufpe.br/%7Ehemr> >> >> > Informatics Center, UFPE, Brazil >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > aspectj-users mailing list >> >> > aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> >> > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> aspectj-users mailing list >> >> aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> ............................................................................................................................... >> > Henrique Rebelo >> > http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~hemr <http://www.cin.ufpe.br/%7Ehemr> >> > Informatics Center, UFPE, Brazil >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > aspectj-users mailing list >> > aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> > > > > -- > > ............................................................................................................................... > Henrique Rebelo > http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~hemr <http://www.cin.ufpe.br/%7Ehemr> > Informatics Center, UFPE, Brazil > -- ............................................................................................................................... Henrique Rebelo http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~hemr Informatics Center, UFPE, Brazil
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
