Hi Mahanta da
I think I don't have a jaundiced vision. I don't have
the audacity to claim that I have a vision which may
be acceptable to all. I try to see things as they are.
Occasionally in the past, I remember having seen some
stupid remarks about Sankardeva in different
newspapers and magazines. I never responded as they
did not deserve any rebuttal or refutation due to its
poor quality. I ignored them as barking of mad dogs.
It would be extremely dishonest on my part if I say
that I have seen anything insulting or derogatory
about Sankardeva on assamnet in the past one month or
so after I joined it. I am always for healthy debate
on any issue based on facts and reason. Either I will
try to participate or watch with interest.
I think this will explain my position clearly.
Bye for now.
Mayur
Chandigarh
--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 9:54 AM -0700 10/16/05, mayur bora wrote:
> >Hi Mahanta da
> >
> >I am not aware of the earlier comments on assamnet
> by
> >Deka/Kakati. I don't know whether they are two
> >separate individuals or not. I think basic issue is
> >much more important than that. As regards the last
> >point of your mail, both are inextricably linked.
> >Promoting, propagating, popularising and most
> >importantly practising Sankardeva's philosophy in
> our
> >day to day life is the best way of paying tribute
> to
> >him. But at times, singing praise is also required.
> >
> >Bye
> >
> >Mayur
>
>
> *** Thanks for the reply Mayur. I hoped for the
> answer you gave. And
> I am pleased.
>
> > > But at times, singing praise is also required.
>
> *** I can live with that :-)
>
> But you did not respond to the previous question:
>
>
> >Or was there a determination on your part that
> someone indeed has
> >made disparaging or or baseless charges against
> Xonkordev, and thus
> >the comments were directed against him/her/them?
> And if you did see
> >such comments, which were those?
>
>
> cm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >Chandigarh
> >
> >--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Mayur:
> >>
> >>
> >> > >I am of the view that if
> >> >someone says something on the basis of reason ,
> >> there
> >> >is no harm in analysing it.
> >>
> >>
> >> *** You are right. I agree with you.
> >>
> >>
> >> > > But if a person puts forth
> >> >irresponsible and disparaging views about
> someone
> >> >which is based neither on facts nor on reason,
> then
> >> we
> >> >should ignore it without wasting our energy and
> >> time
> >> >on that.
> >>
> >>
> >> *** I agree with you here too.
> >>
> >> And since no one has made any disparaging
> comments
> >> or baseless
> >> charges against Xonkordev or what he tried to do
> for
> >> the people of
> >> Assam that *I* have noticed here, would it be
> >> reasonable to suggest
> >> that your comment was really directed at Bidyut
> >> Kakati, who is none
> >> other than Rabin Deka in disguise ( in disguise
> >> because he was thrown
> >> out o account of a persistent and long record of
> >> making stupid
> >> personal attacks against a number of netters) ?
> >>
> >> If so why can't you say it like it is?
> >>
> >> Or was there a determination on your part that
> >> someone indeed has
> >> made disparaging or or baseless charges against
> >> Xonkordev, and thus
> >> the comments were directed against him/her/them?
> And
> >> if you did see
> >> such comments, which were those?
> >>
> >>
> >> And finally a question for you and all others
> here:
> >>
> >> *** What is more important to note, to protect,
> to
> >> uphold, to
> >> promote, to expend one's energies on:
> >> Xonkordev's message, or his persona? If you were
> >> Xonkordev, what
> >> would your advice to your followers be?
> >>
> >>
> >> cm :-)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> At 9:22 PM -0700 10/15/05, mayur bora wrote:
> >> >Hi Mahanta da
> >> >
> >> >Please refer to the quotation of my earlier
> mail.
> >> You
> >> >will find the rationale. I am of the view that
> if
> >> >someone says something on the basis of reason ,
> >> there
> >> >is no harm in analysing it. But if a person
> puts
> >> forth
> >> >irresponsible and disparaging views about
> someone
> >> >which is based neither on facts nor on reason,
> then
> >> we
> >> >should ignore it without wasting our energy and
> >> time
> >> >on that.
> >> >
> >> >Mayur
> >> >Chandigarh
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Mayur:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> I presume this is the same 'seraa-paagol'
> Rabin
> >> >> Deka that was kicked
> >> >> out of Assam Net, but has returned like the
> >> 'nirgot'
> >> >> he is. This
> >> >> moron has a habit of
> >> >> picking out words and phrases or comments
> out of
> >> >> context to
> >> >> personally attack others personally in Assam
> >> Net.
> >> >> Therefore, in the
> >> >> public interest, I will forward those
> exchanges
> >> for
> >> >> those who might
> >> >> be interested.
> >> >>
> >> >> >This is not meant for any individual.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> *** Then why did you post it :-)? The net is
> >> made up
> >> >> of many
> >> >> 'individuals' Mayur. Did you forget that? Or
> are
> >> you
> >> >> trying to have
> >> >> it both ways?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >But if anyone is disrespectful to
> Sankaradeva,
> > > we
> >> >> should ignore it.
> >> >>
> >> >> *** May I ask you WHY you or WE should
> ignore
> >> it,
> >> >> instead of dwelling
> >> >> on it or going to war over it? I would be
> very
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
