At 10:25 PM -0700 10/16/05, mayur bora wrote: >Hi Mahanta da > >I think I don't have a jaundiced vision.
*** From your note, I, just as well as anyone who has a minimally functioning brain, can assure you that you are correct :-). Not that I had a doubt. But sometimes these things need clarified, lest it goes over the feeble-minded freaks. That is why I asked for a response. Take care. cm > I don't have >the audacity to claim that I have a vision which may >be acceptable to all. I try to see things as they are. >Occasionally in the past, I remember having seen some >stupid remarks about Sankardeva in different >newspapers and magazines. I never responded as they >did not deserve any rebuttal or refutation due to its >poor quality. I ignored them as barking of mad dogs. >It would be extremely dishonest on my part if I say >that I have seen anything insulting or derogatory >about Sankardeva on assamnet in the past one month or >so after I joined it. I am always for healthy debate >on any issue based on facts and reason. Either I will >try to participate or watch with interest. > >I think this will explain my position clearly. > >Bye for now. > >Mayur >Chandigarh > > > > > > >--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> At 9:54 AM -0700 10/16/05, mayur bora wrote: >> >Hi Mahanta da >> > >> >I am not aware of the earlier comments on assamnet >> by >> >Deka/Kakati. I don't know whether they are two >> >separate individuals or not. I think basic issue is >> >much more important than that. As regards the last >> >point of your mail, both are inextricably linked. >> >Promoting, propagating, popularising and most >> >importantly practising Sankardeva's philosophy in >> our >> >day to day life is the best way of paying tribute >> to >> >him. But at times, singing praise is also required. >> > >> >Bye >> > >> >Mayur >> >> >> *** Thanks for the reply Mayur. I hoped for the >> answer you gave. And >> I am pleased. >> >> > > But at times, singing praise is also required. >> >> *** I can live with that :-) >> >> But you did not respond to the previous question: >> >> >> >Or was there a determination on your part that >> someone indeed has >> >made disparaging or or baseless charges against >> Xonkordev, and thus >> >the comments were directed against him/her/them? >> And if you did see >> >such comments, which were those? >> >> >> cm >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Chandigarh >> > >> >--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Mayur: >> >> >> >> >> >> > >I am of the view that if >> >> >someone says something on the basis of reason , >> >> there >> >> >is no harm in analysing it. >> >> >> >> >> >> *** You are right. I agree with you. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > But if a person puts forth >> >> >irresponsible and disparaging views about >> someone >> >> >which is based neither on facts nor on reason, >> then >> >> we >> >> >should ignore it without wasting our energy and >> >> time >> >> >on that. >> >> >> >> >> >> *** I agree with you here too. >> >> >> >> And since no one has made any disparaging >> comments >> >> or baseless >> >> charges against Xonkordev or what he tried to do >> for >> >> the people of >> >> Assam that *I* have noticed here, would it be >> >> reasonable to suggest >> >> that your comment was really directed at Bidyut >> >> Kakati, who is none >> >> other than Rabin Deka in disguise ( in disguise >> >> because he was thrown >> >> out o account of a persistent and long record of >> >> making stupid >> >> personal attacks against a number of netters) ? >> >> >> >> If so why can't you say it like it is? >> >> >> >> Or was there a determination on your part that >> >> someone indeed has >> >> made disparaging or or baseless charges against >> >> Xonkordev, and thus >> >> the comments were directed against him/her/them? >> And >> >> if you did see >> >> such comments, which were those? >> >> >> >> >> >> And finally a question for you and all others >> here: >> >> >> >> *** What is more important to note, to protect, > > to >> >> uphold, to >> >> promote, to expend one's energies on: >> >> Xonkordev's message, or his persona? If you were >> >> Xonkordev, what >> >> would your advice to your followers be? >> >> >> >> >> >> cm :-) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> At 9:22 PM -0700 10/15/05, mayur bora wrote: >> >> >Hi Mahanta da >> >> > >> >> >Please refer to the quotation of my earlier >> mail. >> >> You >> >> >will find the rationale. I am of the view that >> if >> >> >someone says something on the basis of reason , >> >> there >> >> >is no harm in analysing it. But if a person >> puts >> >> forth >> >> >irresponsible and disparaging views about >> someone >> >> >which is based neither on facts nor on reason, >> then >> >> we >> >> >should ignore it without wasting our energy and >> >> time >> >> >on that. >> >> > >> >> >Mayur >> >> >Chandigarh >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Hi Mayur: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I presume this is the same 'seraa-paagol' >> Rabin >> >> >> Deka that was kicked >> >> >> out of Assam Net, but has returned like the >> >> 'nirgot' >> >> >> he is. This >> >> >> moron has a habit of >> >> >> picking out words and phrases or comments >> out of >> >> >> context to >> >> >> personally attack others personally in Assam >> >> Net. >> >> >> Therefore, in the >> >> >> public interest, I will forward those >> exchanges >> >> for >> >> >> those who might >> >> >> be interested. >> >> >> >> >> >> >This is not meant for any individual. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *** Then why did you post it :-)? The net is >> >> made up >> >> >> of many >> >> >> 'individuals' Mayur. Did you forget that? Or >> are >> >> you >> >> >> trying to have >> >> >> it both ways? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >But if anyone is disrespectful to >> Sankaradeva, >> > > we >> >> >> should ignore it. >> >> >> >> >> >> *** May I ask you WHY you or WE should >> ignore >> >> it, >> >> >> instead of dwelling >> >> >> on it or going to war over it? I would be >> very >> >=== message truncated === > > > > > >__________________________________ >Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 >http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
