From the Sentinel

Whom should we blame it on?
Thanks to illegal immigration from Bangladesh, the demographic  
profile of Asom has been reversed.
By a Staff Reporter
GUWAHATI, June 18: Do the formation of the United Liberation Front of  
Asom (ULFA) and its leaders taking shelter in Bangladesh have  
anything to do with the present demographic trend in Asom? Though  
these two are seemingly different issues, yet the religion-wise  
population figures of census reports compel one to look at the  
current demographic pattern of the State from that angle too.
The ULFA was formed on April 7, 1979 with the demand for a “sovereign  
Asom”, and ULFA leaders took shelter in Bangladesh in 1989. Census  
reports reveal that Muslim population in the State — thanks to  
illegal immigration from Bangladesh — started to rise steeply since  
the ULFA was formed and its leaders took shelter in Bangladesh.
According to sources, an ULFA cadre first went to Bangladesh in 1989  
and met a minister belonging to the Bangladesh Nationalist Party  
(BNP), and that meeting paved the way for ULFA cadres getting arms  
training under the ISI in Peshawar in Pakistan, in 1990-91. Of  
course, the first batch of 40 ULFA cadres, including ‘commander-in- 
chief’ Paresh Baruah, got arms training under the NSCN at its camps  
in Myanmar in 1983. The second batch of 90 ULFA cadres, including  
Arabinda Rajkhowa and Kalpajyoti Neog, got arms training under the  
NSCN at Kachin in Myanmar, in 1986.
The census figures, on the other hand, say that Hindu population of  
Goalpara district in 1971 was 50.11 per cent against 41.50 per cent  
Muslim population, but after 20 years — in 1991 — Hindu population in  
the district fell abruptly to 39.89 per cent, while Muslim population  
rose steeply to 50.18 per cent. In Dhubri district, Hindu population  
in 1971 was 38.80 per cent against 60.46 per cent Muslim population,  
but in 1991, Hindu population declined to 28.73 per cent while the  
Muslim population rose to 70.45 per cent. In Barpeta district, Hindu  
population in 1971 was 51.12 per cent against 48.65 Muslim  
population, but 20 years later, Muslim population rose to 56.07 per  
cent leaving the Hindu population behind at 40.26 per cent. In  
Hailakandi district, Hindu population in 1971 was 47.48 per cent  
against 51.40 per cent Muslim population, but 20 years later, while  
Hindu population fell to 43.71 per cent, Muslim population rose to  
54.79 per cent. In most of the other districts, Hindu population  
registered a slight fall, while Muslim population registered a rise.
As per the 2001 Census report, the overall Hindu population in the  
State was 64.9 per cent against 67.1 per cent in 1991, while for  
Muslim population the figures for the corresponding years stood at  
30.9 per cent and 28.4 per cent.
It may be mentioned here that The Sentinel published a report  
recently quoting intelligence reports that over 20 jehadi groups have  
tied up with the ULFA so as to carry out subversive activities in the  
State. Circles concerned in the State think that after the emergence  
of the ULFA, there has been a large-scale infiltration from  
Bangladesh to Asom. Repeated attacks on Hindi-speaking people, who  
comprise a large part of the labour force in the State, are an  
attempt to create job avenues for illegal Bangladeshis. Now the  
demographic trend in some lower Asom districts has reached such a  
pretty pass that an AUDF MLA even went to the extent of raising the  
demand for an “autonomous council” for the “minorities” of those  
districts. Circles concerned in the State feel that the ULFA’s goal  
of an “independent Asom” has virtually turned into a goal for a  
“greater Bangladesh” comprising Asom as the most cherished territory.
On the other hand, the BSF has also failed to check infiltration from  
Bangladesh as also other illegal cross-border activities, thanks to  
the porous border that is yet to completely fenced. Had the  
Government of India been awake to the urgent need for completely  
sealing the Indo-Bangladesh border, with the same promptness as shown  
in respect of Jammu & Kashmir or Punjab in relation to the border  
with Pakistan, one could have hoped for a bit of action on the ground  
against illegal immigration from Bangladesh. But that is yet to  
happen. If the ULFA is a gainer of sorts by having to get a safe  
sanctuary in Bangladesh, the illegal Bangladeshis in Asom are also an  
equal gainer — thanks, of course, to the ULFA’s silence on these  
illegal lot, and thus its silence on the process of reverse  
demography in the State.
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to