The Sentinel blaming ULFA for the change in demography is the same kind of 
logic as ULFA blaming RSS and APW for bringing bombs and violence to Assam as 
alleged in a recent publication. Both show outstanding deductive reasoning!
  Independent of who the players are, the process of this blame game is mind 
boggling.
  =================================================================
        I know I am not the most sympathetic of Sentinel editorial pieces. But 
that is easily understood by our friends, since I am avowedly biased, against 
that is, what the Sentinel usually spouts , be it openly or be it in the guise 
of analyses.
  

  But this piece, I must say is OUTSTANDING!
  

  It is not hard to understand why. But still, at the risk of attempting to 
point out the obvious , I seek my fellow netters' indulgence in underscoring 
them:
  

  

  

  >Do the formation of the United Liberation Front of   >Asom (ULFA) and its 
leaders taking shelter in Bangladesh have   >anything to do with the present 
demographic trend in Asom?
  

  

  > Circles concerned in the State think that after the emergence 
of the ULFA, there has been a large-scale infiltration from   >Bangladesh to 
Asom.
  

  ( As is obvious from the statistics cited)
  

  

  >If the ULFA is a gainer of sorts by having to get a safe 
sanctuary in Bangladesh, the illegal Bangladeshis in Asom are also an   equal 
gainer - thanks, of course, to the ULFA's silence on these 
illegal lot, and thus its silence on the process of reverse   >demography in 
the State.
  

  

  

  >It may be mentioned here that The Sentinel published a report   recently 
quoting intelligence reports that over 20 jehadi groups have   tied up with the 
ULFA so as to carry out subversive activities in the   >State.
  

  

  > Repeated attacks on Hindi-speaking people, who 
>comprise a large part of the labour force in the State, are an   >attempt to 
>create job avenues for illegal Bangladeshis.
  

  

  **** Now, putting two and two together ( the unimpeachable evidence above 
that is ),can anyone ( I mean other than the die-hard anti-Indian  ) in his 
right mind NOT conclude that:
  

  Circles concerned in the State feel that the ULFA's goal   of an "independent 
Asom" has virtually turned into a goal for a   "greater Bangladesh" comprising 
Asom as the most cherished territory ?
  

  

  **** Rarely have I seen such clarity and incisiveness in sorting out complex 
statistics and secretive intelligence reports in presenting to the 
fair-and-balanced and patriotic Indian readers, in simple prose, the 
unadulterated but disgusting truths about ULFA and its nefarious designs.
  

  Where is the ULFA, that Assam once put together and sent out, with 'gamosaar 
tongaali', to give war on the 'lungi menace' and rid Assam of the 'adha-kota' 
plague?  Where is the ULFA that the likes of the Sentinel egged on to go die 
for preserving Assam for the Bamuns' and Kayosthos'  peace of mind?
  Where is the ULFA that the Assam establishment sponsored, armed, sheltered 
and trained for border protection, which the BSF and the Indian Owners of Assam 
cannot or would not?
  

  

  What a tragic turn of events! What khai-paat-fola ( ingrates) these ULFAs are!
  

  

  **** Now my friends you know WHY even  *I * consider this editorial 
OUTSTANDING, which you the
  rest, must already have known, even before Jyoti brought it to light.
  

  

  Yours not-so-truly,
  

  cm
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  At 12:54 PM +0800 6/19/07, Jyotirmoy Sharma wrote:
   From the Sentinel

Whom should we blame it on?
Thanks to illegal immigration from Bangladesh, the demographic 
profile of Asom has been reversed.
By a Staff Reporter  GUWAHATI, June 18: Do the formation of the United 
Liberation Front of 
Asom (ULFA) and its leaders taking shelter in Bangladesh have   anything to do 
with the present demographic trend in Asom? Though 
these two are seemingly different issues, yet the religion-wise 
population figures of census reports compel one to look at the 
current demographic pattern of the State from that angle too.
The ULFA was formed on April 7, 1979 with the demand for a "sovereign 
Asom", and ULFA leaders took shelter in Bangladesh in 1989. Census 
reports reveal that Muslim population in the State - thanks to 
illegal immigration from Bangladesh - started to rise steeply since 
the ULFA was formed and its leaders took shelter in Bangladesh.
According to sources, an ULFA cadre first went to Bangladesh in 1989   and met 
a minister belonging to the Bangladesh Nationalist Party 
(BNP), and that meeting paved the way for ULFA cadres getting arms 
training under the ISI in Peshawar in Pakistan, in 1990-91. Of 
course, the first batch of 40 ULFA cadres, including 'commander-in-
chief' Paresh Baruah, got arms training under the NSCN at its camps 
in Myanmar in 1983. The second batch of 90 ULFA cadres, including 
Arabinda Rajkhowa and Kalpajyoti Neog, got arms training under the 
NSCN at Kachin in Myanmar, in 1986.
The census figures, on the other hand, say that Hindu population of 
Goalpara district in 1971 was 50.11 per cent against 41.50 per cent 
Muslim population, but after 20 years - in 1991 - Hindu population in 
the district fell abruptly to 39.89 per cent, while Muslim population 
rose steeply to 50.18 per cent. In Dhubri district, Hindu population 
in 1971 was 38.80 per cent against 60.46 per cent Muslim population, 
but in 1991, Hindu population declined to 28.73 per cent while the 
Muslim population rose to 70.45 per cent. In Barpeta district, Hindu 
population in 1971 was 51.12 per cent against 48.65 Muslim 
population, but 20 years later, Muslim population rose to 56.07 per 
cent leaving the Hindu population behind at 40.26 per cent. In 
Hailakandi district, Hindu population in 1971 was 47.48 per cent 
against 51.40 per cent Muslim population, but 20 years later, while   Hindu 
population fell to 43.71 per cent, Muslim population rose to   54.79 per cent. 
In most of the other districts, Hindu population 
registered a slight fall, while Muslim population registered a rise.
As per the 2001 Census report, the overall Hindu population in the 
State was 64.9 per cent against 67.1 per cent in 1991, while for 
Muslim population the figures for the corresponding years stood at 
30.9 per cent and 28.4 per cent.  It may be mentioned here that The Sentinel 
published a report 
recently quoting intelligence reports that over 20 jehadi groups have 
tied up with the ULFA so as to carry out subversive activities in the   State. 
Circles concerned in the State think that after the emergence 
of the ULFA, there has been a large-scale infiltration from   Bangladesh to 
Asom. Repeated attacks on Hindi-speaking people, who 
comprise a large part of the labour force in the State, are an   attempt to 
create job avenues for illegal Bangladeshis. Now the 
demographic trend in some lower Asom districts has reached such a 
pretty pass that an AUDF MLA even went to the extent of raising the 
demand for an "autonomous council" for the "minorities" of those   districts. 
Circles concerned in the State feel that the ULFA's goal 
of an "independent Asom" has virtually turned into a goal for a   "greater 
Bangladesh" comprising Asom as the most cherished territory.
On the other hand, the BSF has also failed to check infiltration from 
Bangladesh as also other illegal cross-border activities, thanks to 
the porous border that is yet to completely fenced. Had the 
Government of India been awake to the urgent need for completely 
sealing the Indo-Bangladesh border, with the same promptness as shown 
in respect of Jammu & Kashmir or Punjab in relation to the border 
with Pakistan, one could have hoped for a bit of action on the ground   against 
illegal immigration from Bangladesh. But that is yet to   happen. If the ULFA 
is a gainer of sorts by having to get a safe 
sanctuary in Bangladesh, the illegal Bangladeshis in Asom are also an 
equal gainer - thanks, of course, to the ULFA's silence on these 
illegal lot, and thus its silence on the process of reverse   demography in the 
State.
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org  

_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to