> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chan Mahanta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Satyen Das" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "R. Sarangapani" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 9:49 AM > Subject: Re: [Assam] Re: Assamese Associations > > > I know that Satyen's account and impressions about AFNA's association with > AANA etc. are accurate. > > > But let us examine that for a moment: > > > *** One might ask: So what? What is so terrible about that? > > To be fair, I see absolutely NOTHING bad or sinister about the > relationship. It was NOT a hidden and/or surreptitious relationship for > anyone who is familiar with the US -Oxomiya community affairs. > ++++Chandan, I never said it is terrible to have relationship with other organizations. That is your own interpretation. I was just pointing out that AANA and AFNA are intimately(!) connected and I cannot accept when somebody says AFNA is not at all connected to AANA as long as things I mentioned earlier exists.
However, how IRS views it for a tax exempt non-profit org is a different matter. _______________________________________________ Assam mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
