++++Chandan, I never said it is terrible to have relationship with other > organizations. > That is your own interpretation.
Satyen: I did not mean to suggest YOU implied that. It was a rhetorical question--'kothar maat :-). That's all. c At 10:38 PM -0400 8/24/03, Satyen Das wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Chan Mahanta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "Satyen Das" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "R. Sarangapani" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 9:49 AM >> Subject: Re: [Assam] Re: Assamese Associations >> >> > > I know that Satyen's account and impressions about AFNA's association >with > > AANA etc. are accurate. > > > > > > But let us examine that for a moment: > > > > > > *** One might ask: So what? What is so terrible about that? > > > > To be fair, I see absolutely NOTHING bad or sinister about the > > relationship. It was NOT a hidden and/or surreptitious relationship for > > anyone who is familiar with the US -Oxomiya community affairs. > > > ++++Chandan, I never said it is terrible to have relationship with other > organizations. > That is your own interpretation. I was just pointing out that AANA and >AFNA > are intimately(!) connected and I cannot accept when somebody says AFNA is > not at all connected to AANA as long as things I mentioned earlier exists. > > However, how IRS views it for a tax exempt non-profit org is a different >matter. _______________________________________________ Assam mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
