> >But the
> >journalism and journalist should be neutral and we
> >count on them.
>
> *** Can you cite a few examples of that :-)?
> >journalism and journalist should be neutral and we
> >count on them.
>
> *** Can you cite a few examples of that :-)?
I think this is a wrong response to a
statement with word "should'. Why it is so difficult to understand the simple
statement. 'Should be beutral' here simply means without taking any political
side or being biased to any other agenda. Imagine your own example, unless you
are trying to suggest that all journalists are biased to one side or the other
in which case we should agree to dis agree.
In my opinion, a journalist's duty should
be to act as a camera to present the news as it is and to give a factual
perspective so that people can understand the news in broader
perspective.
Rajen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chan Mahanta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ganesh C Bora" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<assam@pikespeak.uccs.edu>
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] From the
Tehelka
> >C'da,
> >My point was that all politician and political parties
> >have their ideologies (or biased ness).
>
>
> *** I agree.
>
>
> >But the the
> >journalism and journalist should be neutral and we
> >count on them.
>
> *** Can you cite a few examples of that :-)?
>
>
>
> >I agree with your point that Tehelka
> >did a good work in exposing the defense deals where
> >BJP president and NDA coordinator George Fernandes was
> >involved for which Tarun Tejpal was penalized by the
> >then govt.
>
> *** The penalizing was arbitrary, and politically motivated. The law
> of the land was misused to hold Tejpal in prison, with political
> might, and not with due process of justice expected of a functioning
> democratic state.
>
>
> >
> >Does this case give freeway to Tehelka to be biased?
>
>
> *** Unfortunately Ganesh, freedom of the press does allow such
> things. And they are not unique in this regard. Everybody else is
> like that too. That is why asked you for a few examples of the
> scrupulously objective or neutral voices of the media that you or I
> might like to see.
>
> The only recourse to it is that others are just free to rebut or
> refute what Tehelka alleges or insinuates. But we also know that it
> is easier said than done. Take for example a letter to the editor. I
> don't know how many times you have tried that--I mean write letters
> to the editor and get published. But I certainly had no luck, except
> once. Why? Because I write about stuff that causes discomfiture to
> that particular paper's editorial bent, its biases. Why would it give
> publicity to that?
>
>
> >Or write a biased article against whom they do not
> >like?
>
> *** It is not that simple however. Because if they write pure
> fabrication, sooner or later it will get exposed. When that happens,
> they will lose credibility and there will be no buyer of what they
> sell. I subscribed to Tehelka recently. If I had a perception that
> they make up sensational stories without any substance, I would not
> have spent the money, even if its political leanings might fit my own.
>
>
> >The author in the article did not present any
> >investigation findings, only re-affirming that the
> >Maharani belongs to RSS! Is that news!
>
>
> *** If it were not news or otherwise noticeable, would you be upset?
>
> Tehelka wrote about some of the policies the Maharani is pursuing.
> They are very corrosive for Indian society. But these are in the
> public record. Tehelka had the courage and the will to write about
> them. However there are just as many outlets who would NOT write
> about them.
>
> In that Tehelka IS indeed providing a service to the people as a
> watchdog of democracy, which is what a free-press is.
>
> c-da
>
>
>
>
> >
> >Ganesh
> >
> >
> >--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ganesh:
> >>
> >> You may be very right about the fact that the
> >> personal picture of the Maharani
> >> painted by Tehelka is biased and/or one sided.
> >> Certainly the latter, because
> >> no alternative view was presented.
> >>
> >> But, would that make Tehelka's picture unique?
> >>
> >> Would that also automatically make some of the
> >> retrograde policies that the
> >> Maharani has established or is pursuing either
> >> unbelievable or in fact wrong
> >> or misleading? Are those NOT in the public record,
> >> that anyone could distort
> >> them and get-away with?
> >>
> >> Finally, Tehelka is India's best known Investigative
> >> Journalism endeavor. Desi-
> >> demokrasy-bhoktos of Assam Net have been advocating
> >> more IJ, not less, as
> >> an antidote to its dysfunctionality. I don't know
> >> what your view is on that, but
> >> certainly Tehelka is contributing more than its fair
> >> share.If they are biased
> >> could their view not be challenged abd rebutted? If
> >> they are malicious, could
> >> its victims not sue in court? Surely George
> >> Fernandes and the BJP had Tarun
> >> Tejpal imprisioned for months on the expose' it
> >> aired on thye BJP president's
> >> bribery case and GF's involvement on questionable
> >> military purchases. They
> >> almost closed Tehelka down --with political muscle,
> > > not on legal grounds.
> >>
> >> So the BJP is not exactly thye helpless victim of an
> >> ideological enemy. Is it?
> >>
> >>
> >> c-da
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> > From: Ganesh C Bora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > Date: 2005/05/19 Thu AM 10:05:33 EDT
> >> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> >> assam@pikespeak.uccs.edu
> >> > Subject: Re: [Assam] From the Tehelka
> >> >
> >> > C'da,
> >> > You know the relationship between Tehelka and BJP!
> >> > This article is too much onesided. She refers to
> >> Mani
> >> > Shankar Aiyer, who is typical congressman
> >> (suspeneded,
> >> > joined opposition, returned to party like Pranab,
> >> > Arjun).
> >> >
> >> > On the other hand, she has been a BJP worker for
> >> long
> >> > time and being MP for 4 times (including a being
> >> > minister in the union) before she became the CM.
> >> > Definitely she would have tilt towards RSS/VHP
> >> because
> >> > of her background!
> >> >
> >> > Do you think she will sing Sonia bandana or sing
> >> to
> >> > the tune of communist (What this Tehelka report
> >> does).
> >> >
> >> > Ganesh
> >> >
> >> > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > SAFFRON CHAMPAGNE
> >> > > A pearls-and-chiffon socialite or a closet
> >> fanatic?
> >> > > Poornima Joshi discovers
> >> > > the real Vasundhara Raje
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Desert Queen: Vasundhara in Rajasthani costume
> >> > > Photo S. Khan
> >> > >
> >> > > For the Davis Cup tie on April 29, Vasundhara
> >> was to
> >> > > deliver the opening
> >> > > address. The match was to start at 9.30am. She
> >> > > sauntered in only at
> >> > > 10.45am. Even the world?s third richest man LN
> >> > > Mittal had to wait for half-
> >> > > an-hour to meet the CM
> >> > > >From the tip of a manicured toe to the
> >> disdainful
> >> > > toss of her lustrous mane,
> >> > > everything about the Maharani of Dholpur aka
> >> > > Rajasthan Chief Minister
> >> > > Vasundhara Raje spells arrogance. She is
> >> > > out-of-bounds and above the
> >> > > mundane world of governance. Her officers
> >> tremble
> >> > > even as they get her to
> >> > > do the most basic of a chief minister?s tasks ?
> >> like
> >> > > clearing files. The only
> >> > > time the maharani switches her regal demeanour
> >> is
> >> > > when she is hobnobbing
> >> > > with astrologers and pandits, and temple-hopping
> >> in
> >> > > ethnic chic, with dollops
> >> > > of sindoor for the benefit of her doting praja.
> >> > >
> >> > > As most of her contemporaries trample their
> >> chances
> >> > > in the battle for the top
> >> > > job in the BJP ? Uma Bharti with her tantrums
> >> and
> >> > > Narendra Modi with his
> >> > > high-handedness ? Vasundhara?s popularity
> >> ratings
> >> > > continue to soar. Even
> >> > > the most vocal of the Sangh adversaries have
> >> only
> >> > > nice things to say about
> >> > > her. ?Vasundhara Raje is not Uma Bharti,? wrote
> >> Mani
> >> > > Shankar Aiyar in his
> >> > > pre-ministerial days, obviously referring to
> >> Raje?s
> >> > > ?liberal? credentials as
> >> > > compared to the rabble-rousing sanyasin.
> >> > >
> >> > > Aiyar is right. Vasundhara is not Uma. The
> >> > > sindoor-wielding maharani is a far
> >> > > more circumspect and shrewd politician than poor
> >> Uma
> >> > > who hurts herself
> >> > > every time she opens her mouth. The two women,
> >> who
> >> > > fought the Assembly
> >> > > elections in Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan in the
> >> > > same year, have charted
> >> > > out courses that are similar in ideological
> >> essence
> >> > > but quite different in
> >> > > presentation.
> >> > >
> >> > > So, while Uma prays with sundry sadhus in
> >> > > Amarkantak, Vasundhara has done
> >> > > what would keep RSS satraps happy for a long
> >> time.
> >> > > Take a look at the
> >> > > measures taken to keep the Sangh in good
> >> spirits:
> >> > >
> >> > > She has not appealed against the lower court
> >> order
> >> > > on the Deorala Sati
> >> > > incident acquitting all the accused;
> >> > > The practice of Sati is being glorified. The
> >> state
> >> > > government recently
> >> > > announced the setting up of a township named
> >> ?Shri
> >> > > Rani Sati Nagar?. After
> >> > > protests, the government omitted ?Sati? from the
> >> > > name, letting it remain Shri
> >> > > Rani Nagar;
> >> > > The government is encouraging the Vanavasi
> >> Kalyan
> >> > > Ashram, an RSS offshoot,
> >> > > to open more schools in tribal areas. Even the
> >> > > Muslim students have to sport
> >> > > tilaks and recite shlokas in these schools;
> > > > > There has been a spate of communal incidents in
> >> the
> >> > > state, the latest
> >> > > erupting in Bhilwara town after the alleged
> >> killing
> >> > > of an RSS activist;
> >> > > In the areas where communal tension resulted in
> >> the
> >> > > police registering cases
> >> > > against VHP and Bajrang Dal activists,
> >> counter-firs
> >> > > have been filed against the
> >> > > victims, mostly Muslims. According to human
> >> rights
> >> > > groups, there are 150
> >> > > such counter-firs;
> >> > > She has lifted the ban on trishul diksha.
> >> > > In the areas neighbouring Gujarat, incidents of
> >> > > communal violence are on the
> >> > > rise. Local activists allege that the RSS,
> >> Bajrang
> >> > > Dal and VHP are inciting
> >> > > tribals to attack the Muslim population in these
> >>
> >=== message truncated ===
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >__________________________________
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
> >http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
> _______________________________________________
> Assam mailing list
> Assam@pikespeak.uccs.edu
> http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
>
> Mailing list FAQ:
> http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
> To unsubscribe or change options:
> http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
>
_______________________________________________ Assam mailing list Assam@pikespeak.uccs.edu http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
Mailing list FAQ: http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html To unsubscribe or change options: http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
