"native-Assamese = Ahom" is what is I am using, a professional representation e.g., born in United Kingdom is a British think of a Ahom state in India, imagine to introduce
If your great grand were born in Ahom kingdom you have soft-gene of Ahom system -- like co-ordinate points on the axes of Ahom system -- 600 years was good enough to alter soft-gene. Repulsive-mannered (also parametric-mannered) seen now among Ahom nationals is probably soft-gene driven (lets hope for the best and this is not true). If true we can predict where Ahom nationals will be on time axis (over time) in future, and where they drag Assam along with them. In addition to Manoj Rajib Bhattacharyya wrote as well that ULFA leaders are Moran-Mataks. Correct me: Pradip Gogoi and Arabindia Rajkhowa are the two who claimed to be founding members of ULFA and Bhimkanta Burhagohain is the one regarded as the founding member & ideal of ULFA. Then they had recruited whole lot. Using definition of Manoj Das and Rajib Bhattacharyya, current Chief Minister of Assam Tarun Gogoi must be Moran-Matak -- branch of Chutiya. Am I correct here? rabin --- "Manoj Das" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ULFA leaders are not Ahoms. They come from a branch of Sutiyas, called 'Moran' and are by religion disciples of 'Dinjan sattra'- motoks. -manoj --- On Sun, 6/29/08, rabindeka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: see - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/assamonline/message/4288
