Peter, I am confused, can you help me understand. I read your your excellent explanation. If the Getmain fails...what's the result ? Abend ? or bad rc ?
We specify Getmain Ru,lv=(1) I understand it's unconditional, Checkzero= no ...no problem here Scott ford www.identityforge.com On Jun 7, 2012, at 7:36 AM, Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote: >> But Binyamin said that GETMAIN RU does not have a >> defined return code; and that's not so. > > The only time GETMAIN RU can have a non-0 RC is when CheckZeroRC=YES is > specified. > Thus, there is a *useful* return code for GETMAIN RU only when > CheckZeroRC=YES. > So GETMAIN RU has a "defined return code" of 0 but, as Binyamin wrote, > that is meaningless in this case since > for this invocation the R15 is always 0 upon return (as it abends if the > obtain fails). > > SP229 never "spills" into SP230. If the trace shows SP230 then there were > obtains from SP230. > If the trace does not show SP229 then there were no obtains from SP229 > within the timespan represented in the trace. > > AllowUserKeyCSA has nothing to do with obtains from non-CSA subpools. > There are no "issues" with the AllowUserKeyCSA parameter other than with > anyone who does allow it who cares about system integrity. > > Peter Relson > z/OS Core Technology Design
