Keven Hall wrote:

> I think the point Binyamin is trying to make here is that
> since there was no GETMAIN ABEND, and since CHECKZERO=NO
> was set by default, the storage must have been allocated
> and so the problem is maybe not with the GETMAIN at all.
> The only return code the GETMAIN in the OP's code will
> return is zero; otherwise it would ABEND.

I completely agree that GETMAIN RU will either succeed or abend -- and that 
therefore, the question of the GETMAIN return code was a red herring to the 
main discussion.  But Binyamin said that GETMAIN RU does not have a defined 
return code; and that's not so.

Sorry for the nit-picking digression!

Allen

Reply via email to