I guess, especially if you need to keep a lot of variables in memory "in sync". 
Erg. add deposit amount to new account field and subtract same amount to old 
account field. Can't do that with a CS or PLO type instruction.

--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT

Administrative Services Group

HealthMarkets(r)

9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
[email protected] * www.HealthMarkets.com

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or 
proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact 
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 
HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the 
insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance 
Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The 
MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of John P. Baker
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 6:29 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: The Transaction state (was Model 2827 New Instructions)
>
> David,
>
> Another use of the transaction state would be when a program product is
> updating multiple control blocks as part of a "transaction".
>
> You want external observers to see either all of the updates or none of
> the
> updates.
>
> The same methodology can apply to statistical counters.
>
> I can see many uses for transactional processing.
>
> John P. Baker
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-
> [email protected]]
> On Behalf Of David Cole
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 3:09 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: The Transaction state (was Model 2827 New Instructions)
>
> >I now tend to be a "strict GUPI" type of programmer. Do you happen to
> >know of a z/OS data structure which is "read mostly"?
>
> John,
>
> Just about !!!every!!! queue of control blocks in the entire system is
> "read
> mostly".
>
> Dave Cole
>
>
>
>
>
> At 9/18/2012 02:57 PM, McKown, John wrote:
> >Thanks, that makes a lot of sense. It is for updating "Read Mostly
> >Memory". Since the death of PLMs, I really don't know much about
> >internals any more. I now tend to be a "strict GUPI" type of
> >programmer. Do you happen to know of a z/OS data structure which is
> >"read mostly"? Thinking about it, the CICS definition control
> >blocks: PPT, PCT, FCT, ... are likely "read mostly" except for a few
> >statistics fields. I don't know much about other things, since we are
> a
> >very primitive shop.
> >
> >--
> >John McKown
> >Systems Engineer IV
> >IT

Reply via email to