> That is my intent. I'm asking for an address in (dynamically allocated) > storage (RX-type address) and a length that the macro is allowed to use at > that > address. I want to make sure the code the macro generates does not write > beyond that area. If the area is to short, I want to inform the programmer, > via > MNOTE about this fact and tell how much storage is needed. This MNOTE will > fail a successful assembly.
I'm still a bit puzzled by this discussion. I would implement this thing the other way around: the macro's just generate whatever amount of code is needed and at runtime I would simply allocate the required amount of memory to hold the generated code. Fred! ----------------------------------------------------------------- ATTENTION: The information in this electronic mail message is private and confidential, and only intended for the addressee. Should you receive this message by mistake, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or use of this message is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender by reply transmission and delete the message without copying or opening it. Messages and attachments are scanned for all viruses known. If this message contains password-protected attachments, the files have NOT been scanned for viruses by the ING mail domain. Always scan attachments before opening them. -----------------------------------------------------------------
