> I'm still a bit puzzled by this discussion. I would implement this thing the > other way around: the macro's just generate whatever amount of code is needed > and at runtime I would simply allocate the required amount of memory to hold > the generated code.
I thought it was easier to change the macro to request a workarea, instead of changing it to the usual MF=E/L formats. The only obstacle was that I wasn't able to come with an acceptable solution for subject at hand. The combined wisdom of all of you, who are much more experienced in assemler topics than I am, leads me to think about MF=E/L formats again. Thanks for all your time. --Peter Hunkeler
