On 2014-11-14 11:17, Gary Weinhold wrote: > You know we're all just talking about presentation of information, not the > information itself. So what we want is a flexible (tailorable?) interface to > the information, not a change in the information itself. So with all the > advances made in user access to information, we're saying it can never apply > to the PoOp information. > Exactly. "Two columns" is just presentation. It's a pity that semantics has been subsumed by presentation.
Just as a point of reference, how does Intel do it (or AMD or Cyrix or IBM supercomputers)? Probably their Principles of Operation are less targeted at end users, but someone still must write the compilers. -- gil
