Perhaps the OP wanted to have HLASM diagnose when a value is used that is too large; IILF would be silent instead of generating ASMA320W. Just speculating....
- mb Tony Harminc <[email protected]> wrote on 01/21/2016 01:56:48 PM: > On 20 January 2016 at 14:21, Swarbrick, Frank > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I don't want IILF because it uses a fullword immediate value > instead of a halfword immediate value. > > Why is this a problem? Surely it's a harmless generalization of a > halfword immediate value. > > > LA could almost be used, except it allows a value of "3/4s of a halfword". > > LAY allows 20 bits. That's "5/8s of a fullword". Too big for you? > > Tony H. >
