Back on the S/360, specifically on the 360/67, there was an operating system 
called TSS/360 that had a virtual partitioned access method (VPAM), which 
included VIPAM; keys within a member.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@listserv.uga.edu> on behalf 
of Steve Smith <sasd...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 9:42 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@listserv.uga.edu
Subject: Re: Device Independence

I suppose you might be kidding, but outside evidence is inconclusive.

Gil's point was clear: IBM is inconsistent with their "rules" about
REXX OPEN, and he demonstrated they are also obtuse.

btw, I can easily imagine a KSDS being used as a PDS; for a large
number of smallish members, it's conceivable that it could be more
efficient than PDS[E].  But it's a given this is not supported by
anything at this time.

sas

p.s. could you fix your email?

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:36 AM, Jon Perryman <jperr...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>> Jon wrote:
...
>> Paul wrote:
>> Spitefully, I tried a concatenation of a PDS followed by a VSAM
>
>> I didn't go to RFE.  I suppose my chances were slim.
>
> You sure are mean. Your chances were nil. There are far worse problems than 
> expecting VSAM to work with PDS.
>
> Regards, Jon.



--
sas

Reply via email to