z/VM? Was that for CMS, GCS, or both?
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [[email protected]] on behalf of Bernd Oppolzer [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 7:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: DEQ Macro Sorry, I looked at the z/VM description by accident ... the z/OS description has the SCOPE parameter as well as the SVC 48 description ... my fault Kind regards Bernd Am 24.05.2021 um 12:53 schrieb Seymour J Metz: > Why do you believe that it is wrong? Leave it (correct) as is. > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > ________________________________________ > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [[email protected]] on > behalf of Bernd Oppolzer [[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 5:38 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: DEQ Macro > > Hello List, > > I am working on some very old code ... > > I just came across a DEQ macro call, and I had to change it to MF=L / MF=E > because of SIIS issues. Now I recognized that the former coder (in 1985 > ca.) > coded a 4th sub-parameter SYSTEMS on the first parameter - which is > allowed (and relevant) > on ENQ, but not on DEQ - if I read the documentation correctly. > > Because DEQ shares the parameter handling with the ENQ macro, this > sub-parameter > is not flagged and causes different code generation for the option > parameter of the SVC 48. > > Now my question: will this option simply be ignored by SVC 48 ? > Can I omit the SYSTEMS sub parameter, or should I leave the macro call > (wrong) as it is ? > Did something go wrong in the past ? > > Kind regards > > Bernd
