Erroneous dots replaced by comma
Am 24.05.2021 um 17:30 schrieb Bernd Oppolzer:
I thought about this.
Thanks anyway. I am very happy that I have asked.
If I changed the parameter, I would have run into serious trouble ...
Code before:
DEQ (PGMNAME,(R3),(R2),SYSTEMS),RET=HAVE
* modified an inline parameter list ... SIIS issue ... reentrancy problem
Code now
MVC DEQL(LDEQL),KDEQL
DEQ (PGMNAME,(R3),(R2),SYSTEMS),RET=HAVE,MF=(E,DEQL)
in constant area:
KDEQL DEQ (0,0,0,SYSTEMS),RET=HAVE,MF=L
EDEQL EQU *
LDEQL EQU EDEQL-KDEQL (is 12)
in working area:
DEQL DEQ (0,0,0,SYSTEMS),RET=HAVE,MF=L
Kind regards
Bernd
Am 24.05.2021 um 17:21 schrieb Seymour J Metz:
OK, that's GCS.question.
BTW, IBM-MAIN would be a better place to ask; it's an OS question
rather than an assembler
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]>
on behalf of Bernd Oppolzer <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 11:06 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: DEQ Macro
As I did often these days, I searched something like "IBM macro DEC"
using G..
and found this:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zvm/7.1?topic=macros-deq
This description has no scope parameter;
I didn't look at the headlines, and because I don't use ENQ/DEQ often,
I thought that DEQ maybe doesn't require the scope parameter (STEP,
SYSTEM, SYSTEMS)
but apparently it does in z/OS.
Kind regards
Bernd
Am 24.05.2021 um 15:18 schrieb Seymour J Metz:
z/VM? Was that for CMS, GCS, or both?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [[email protected]]
on behalf of Bernd Oppolzer [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 7:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: DEQ Macro
Sorry, I looked at the z/VM description by accident ...
the z/OS description has the SCOPE parameter as well as the SVC 48
description ...
my fault
Kind regards
Bernd
