This worked but may not be what you need:
MACRO
&LABEL ZERO &N
&OPCODE SETC 'SR'
&REST SETC '&OPCODE &N,&N'
&LABEL &OPCODE &N,&N
MEND
*Mark*
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 3:20 PM Willy Jensen <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Would a sublisted SETC do, where P(1) is the instruction and P(2) is the
> register?
>
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> På
> vegne af João Reginato
> Sendt: 14. november 2023 22:16
> Til: [email protected]
> Emne: Re: ASMA057E Undefined operation code SR 15,15
>
> without the SETC it works but I need it to simplify the logic of a bigger
> macro.
> .
> João Reginato
> (61) 9911-55500
>
>
> Em ter., 14 de nov. de 2023 às 18:08, Paul Gilmartin <
> [email protected]> escreveu:
>
> > On 11/14/23 13:58:30, João Reginato wrote:
> > > Gil
> > >
> > > I know it works in the way you've proposed but I need to use the
> > > SETC in
> > a
> > > very bigger macro.
> > >.
> > Please post an example showing the failure without the SETC.
> >
> > Would it be better to have two separate MACROs, one of which calls the
> > other?
> >
> > >> Em ter., 14 de nov. de 2023 às 17:46, Paul Gilmartin escreve:>>>> .
> > >>> I believe the SETC is unnecessary. How a bout just:
> > >>> MACRO
> > >>> &REST ZERO &N
> > >>> &REST SR &N,&N
> > >>> MEND
> > >>>
> > >>> START
> > >>> L ZERO 15
> > >>> END
> >
> > --
> > gil
> >
>
