Yes, that's it -----Mensagem original----- De: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> Em nome de Gary Weinhold Enviada em: segunda-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2023 13:59 Para: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Assunto: Re: Reseting RMODE
I think I understand: you wish the last RMODE in a CSECT to override all previous RMODEs in the CSECT or possibly, as Shmuel suggests, the most restrictive to override all others. Gary Weinhold Senior Application Architect DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization Phone:+1.613.523.5500 x216 Email: weinh...@dkl.com Visit us online at www.DKL.com E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. ________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> on behalf of Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> Sent: December 4, 2023 11:44 To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> Subject: Re: Reseting RMODE is there an RFE for an RMODE(MIN) option to accept multiple RMODE statements and use the most restrictive? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> on behalf of Paul Gilmartin <00000014e0e4a59b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu> Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 10:48 AM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: Reseting RMODE (Don't be greedy; don't set personal "Reply-to:") On 12/4/23 07:28:51, João Reginato wrote: > As I've said before, I wasn't clear enough here. > My intent is to change the RMODE during the compilation phase only. > I have all CSECTS with RMODE ANY so, one of them, need to be RMODE 24, and I > cannot change it because the HLASM doesn't allow that. despite it hasn't > finished the compilation of all my csects, issuing the message reported > before. >. Ir would be marginally useful if HLASM, when the programmer codes conflicting RMODE instructions, chose the one most restrictive. But you can simulate this by setting a GBLA wherever any RMODE is needed and choosing the least one with AIF logic near the end of your assembly. -- gil
