Because it's an error whether referenced or not. Why should the assembler add additional code to check that symbol isn't referenced?
I don't understand your last statement. sas On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 11:43 AM João Reginato <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, I understand your point of view. But why show the duplicate as an > error if it is not referenced anywhere? It could be an error just in the > references. > >
