Just for comodity and I can't see a reason for this error. Eventually I use to remember new updates with the actual date or my name for example. And using the column one for that is easier.
Em qua., 1 de mai. de 2024, 08:09, Steve Smith <[email protected]> escreveu: > OK, that could be done. It would potentially generate far more error > messages for essentially one error. I see no reason or value in that > approach. I also think most programmers would strongly object. > > Do you have some reason for needing to define duplicate, yet unreferenced > symbols? > > sas > > On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 12:57 PM João Reginato <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I can't see it as an additional code if it is already checking the > > duplicates. It could only show an error where/when/if the duplicated > field > > is referenced. Simple > > > > >
