I can't see it as an additional code if it is already checking the duplicates. It could only show an error where/when/if the duplicated field is referenced. Simple
Em qua., 1 de mai. de 2024, 07:20, Steve Smith <[email protected]> escreveu: > Because it's an error whether referenced or not. Why should the assembler > add additional code to check that symbol isn't referenced? > > I don't understand your last statement. > > sas > > On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 11:43 AM João Reginato <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Ok, I understand your point of view. But why show the duplicate as an > > error if it is not referenced anywhere? It could be an error just in the > > references. > > > > >
