I use it (PoOP). I also have a 43" "TV" Monitor that I display various PDF documents on, parts of listings, and other things...

I will probably be using it on the next ALC project I am in the process of starting as I will probably have to learn all the 64bit USER instructions.

And yes, I have the white card (s/360-20) the green, yellow, blue and salmon cards. Plus some others.

One of the things I have to use it (ref Sum card) for is remembering "masks" and CC stuff for different instructions. Get away from doing it and you have to refresh your memory... sigh.

Yeah, I'm one of the younger old ones.

Regards,
Steve Thompson

On 10/20/2025 2:46 PM, Dan Greiner wrote:
We ancient fossils fondly remember the "IBM System/360 Reference Data" 
(X20-1703), better known as the green card ... a 12-panel folded document that summarized 
the instructions, mnemonics, operands, and hardware data structures of the original IBM 
S/360. The appearance of a green  card in a shirt pocket – likely behind a pocket 
protector full of pens – identified the bearer as a true believer ... a programmer not to 
be trifled with. Over the decades as the architecture grew from 151 instructions to well 
over 1,200 in the current z/Architecture models, the green card grew into a 
reference-summary booklet (of varying colors) that now exceeds 100 pages.

In this century, IBM eschewed hard copies by (a) providing these documents in a 
PDF for free, and (b) charging outrageous prices prices for hard copy; then 
about 10 years ago, they dropped hard copy completely. For the PoO, this was 
understandable ... it now consumes over two reams of paper  and costs a bundle 
to ship. However, for the Reference Summary, this made the publication MUCH 
less useful. (I have actually printed a copy, trimmed it down to size, taken it 
to Kinko's for comb binding, and never looked at it again. )

Since all of the information in the Reference Summary can be found in the PoO – 
and it seems unlikely that IBM will come to their senses and make hard copy 
again – it seems ridiculous to bother producing it any more. I asked the 
current editor of the documents his opinion, and he agreed that it's unlikely 
that the Reference Summary is useful any more.

This seemed like a great forum to solicit informed opinions. However I do 
hesitate, knowing that some will take this as an opportunity to vent their 
spleen about documentation in general.  Please don't. I simply wish to provide 
feedback to the Systems Architecture group as to whether this document is used 
in its current online-only format.

Reply via email to