> Your code isn’t testing a bite. It’s testing eight bits, so the order of the 
> instructions can definitely alter the outcome..

Kind regards,
Keven Hall  


> On Feb 16, 2026, at 14:12, David Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>>> You need to order the TM tests with the most-bits-on flag value first...
> 
> Well, code shouldn't fail just because tests on the same byte of storage
> change order.
> 
>>> As Mark suggested, maybe you really want CLI instead of TM in this case?
> 
> I guess Dr. John Ehrman's idea doesn't work in complex bit-testing
> scenarios (given that you shouldn't have to "order" the tests from most '1'
> bits to least '1' bits).
> 
> Thanks,
> Dave Clark
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 3:03 PM Farley, Peter <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> You need to order the TM tests with the most-bits-on flag value first
>> followed by the next-highest-count-of-bits-on value, etc.
>> 
>> As Mark suggested, maybe you really want CLI instead of TM in this case?
>> 
>> Peter
>> 
>> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> On
>> Behalf Of David Clark
>> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2026 2:46 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Apparent Test Under Mask Failure
>> 
>> 
>> Can someone please explain to me how the following fails to drop through to
>> 
>> the actual test for C5?  The request at d'8000' is 'E' (x'C5', b'11000101')
>> 
>> but the code is taking the 'D' (x'C4', b'11000100') branch.  Why?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The condition code should result in mixed -- not ones.  Am I going to have
>> 
>> to change from bit mask testing to 'CLI' testing?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 000872 91C4 8000      00000        1842+         TM
>> 
>> REQU_DELETE,L'REQU_DELETE
>> 
>> 000876 A714 0124            00ABE  1843+         JO    TXTDLET
>> 
>> ...snip...
>> 
>> 0008C2 91C5 8000      00000        1994+         TM
>> 
>> REQU_2EBCDIC,L'REQU_2EBCDIC
>> 
>> 0008C6 A714 02D7            00E74  1995+         JO    TXT2EBC
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The bit mask flags are defined as follows--using my own macros based on the
>> 
>> late Dr. John Ehrman's SHARE presentation on the subject.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 000000                              300=TXTREQU  DS    CL1
>> 
>>                      00000 000C4   308+REQU_DELETE  EQU *-1,C'D'
>> 
>>                      00000 000C5   310+REQU_2EBCDIC EQU *-1,C'E'
>> 
>> ...snip...
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> Dave Clark
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>> addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential.
>> If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized
>> representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>> dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>> e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
>> 

Reply via email to