sorry, I meant ONLY the analysis report embedded is still an issue. On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:12 AM, K Post <[email protected]> wrote: > still an issue with 0.5.16. Full details in that release thread. > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Thomas Eckardt/eck > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>2) Request: When reporting spam/ham, my users are seeing an analysis >>>report in the reply email. >> >> An analysis report ? ?? Please show an example. >> >> Thomas >> >> >> >> >> K Post <[email protected]> >> 06.11.2009 17:26 >> Bitte antworten an >> ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> >> >> >> An >> ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> >> Kopie >> >> Thema >> [Assp-test] Issues with Email Interface whitelist request, replies, and >> spam/ham report replies (fairly urgent) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I've found a bunch of issues with the email interface and replies to >> whitelist addition/remval emails and spam/ham reporting replies. >> >> 1) Adding to whitelist via email interface not working 100%. (some >> simply reporting problems, but this is fairly urgent in that some >> cases settings are stopping additions to the whitelist) >> >> I originally wrote a while back that whitelist reports weren't showing >> if an address was already on the whitelist. I was a little off base >> on this, it's worse than that. First, I should mention that my >> EmailAdmins address is different from the EmailWhitelistTo address. >> >> a) Works fine: If the email is from a regular user and >> EmailWhitelistReply is set to "REPLY TO SENDER," whitelist replies >> work as expected. Either showing that the address has been >> whitelisted or already was. >> >> b) Problem: If the email comes from an address in EmailAdmins, the >> report is generated but no information on the addresses added or found >> appear in the body of the message. It doesn't indicate if the address >> was added or if it already existed. >> >> It doesn't even show the address. After submission, I waited a bit >> and checked the whitelist. Big problem - the address isn't actually >> whitelisted! >> >> c) If you change EmailWhitelistReply to "Reply to EmailWhitelistTo", >> and send a request from a regular user, it appears that no matter the >> address in the body of the mail the message sent to the >> EmailWhitelistTo address says: >> >> [email protected]: already on whitelist >> [email protected]: already on whitelist >> >> The address entered by hand (in Outlook 2007) was >> [email protected]. Outlook seems to link the >> email address. There's multiple issues: >> >> c1- There's two addresses listed, the address submitted and a >> truncated version of it, when there was only 1 address in the email >> c2- It says that they're already whitelisted when they weren't. >> c3- On top of that, even though the report says that the real address >> and the truncated address are whitelisted, neither actually are. >> >> I've been playing around a bunch, but I don't think that this problem >> happens if EmailWhitelistReply is set to sender only. There's >> definitely something going on though... >> >> >> 2) Request: When reporting spam/ham, my users are seeing an analysis >> report in the reply email. These are very non-technical users. Is >> there a way that we can just give the "thanks for submitting your >> report" email without doing an analysis? Tech users could always sent >> to the analysis address. >> >> 3) For clarity, I recommend changing the description of EmailErrorsTo, >> from: >> >> Email sent from ASSP acknowledging your submissions will be sent to >> this address. For example: [email protected] >> >> to something like: >> >> This is the email address that will receive copies of Spam/Not-Spam >> reports if EmailErrorsReply is set to "Reply to EmailErrorsTo" or >> "Reply to Both" >> >> Similar wording changes should be made for EmailWhitelistTo, >> EmailRedlistTo, EmailSpamLoverTo, EmailNoProcessingTo, EmailBlackTo, >> and EmailAnalyzeTo. This will make it much clearer to admins that the >> email address is only used if the cooresponding reply setting is set >> appropriately. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 >> 30-Day >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus >> on >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >> _______________________________________________ >> Assp-test mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test >> >> >> >> DISCLAIMER: >> ******************************************************* >> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally >> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the >> >> individual to whom it is addressed. >> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no >> known virus in this email! >> ******************************************************* >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >> _______________________________________________ >> Assp-test mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test >> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
