ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> schreibt: >Reluctantly, we (i.e. assp) have to deal with this. It's not up to us >(i.e. the receiving e-mail server admins) to remove these spamming >ISPs from the DNSBLs.
The default configuation of ASSP (V1/V2) would not have blocked this mail. zen.spamhaus.org=>1|bl.spamcop.net=>1|psbl.surriel.com=>2|ix.dnsbl.manitu.net=>2|l2.apews.org=>3|combined.njabl.org=>1|safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net=>1|dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net=>2|blackholes.five-ten-sg.com=>3 There would have been only 1 hit with 1/2 weight. I do not understand that you are saying, that whitelisting is not working against this problem. Whitelisting is the main tool against this and its working. Greedy AutoWhitelisting and Whitelisting via Email-Interface IS working. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
