Charles Marcus wrote: > I understand completely now... > > Maybe - Michael can you confirm - would the solution be as simple as > having a new option where the user can still have email addresses in > outgoing messages added to the whitelist, but *not* have the messages > themselves contributing to the ham corpus?
I don't think so. For my situation, I know that certainly some of the communications will be legit - and I wouldn't want them to not enter the corpus. Plus I still have all the inbound replies to the "pollution" conversations - and how would ASSP be able to differentiate that? I don't think the upkeep of another list is worth the effort. To elaborate more on what I do: I have analyzed many of the problematic emails that have entered my corpus. My company is legal profession related, so the corpus is focused toward that. Wildly personal email totally breaks away from that pattern, so I use the redRe to ignore messages that contain specific phrases. I see repeating greeting phrases of personal messages that do not conform to our business email, so I redRe them. I match about 30 phrases along those lines. Those few problem users talk about sex, drugs and use profanity, so I redRe similar words in that regards too. YMMV. Only do it if you know what you are doing and hod understanding how it might effect your corpus. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
