"brougham Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: "Andrew Macpherson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >> --On Tuesday, December 05, 2006 11:56:22 -0500 "Eric B." >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> | Under what conditions sould someone report a false-positive as >> | IsNotSpam instead of IsWhitelist? Or vice versa - when should one >> | report it as IsWhiteList instead of IsNoSpam? >> >> Almost always IsNotSpam, except where the message is from a read-only >> mailing list > > Surely a read-only mailing list is where you would want to use IsNotSpam > so > it gets added to the errors/notspam corpus? >
I tend to agree with Andrew - it would make more sense to add it to the WhiteList so it just passes through untouched. Although with the "Spam/Ham Report & Whitelist Add/Remove" feature, it streamlines a lot of things automatically for this. Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
