> "Micheal Espinola Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> Fritz Borgstedt wrote: >>>> Surely a read-only mailing list is where you would want to use >>>> >>> Non Processing >> >> I agree with Fritz. I don't trust the content of >> mailing/distribution/automated lists. I NP most of them. > > If you don't trust the content, why do you NP them? NoProcess would > simply > skip all content filters.... But wouldn't whitelist also accomplish the > same thing? > > Eric
Am I missing something here? - I am under the impression that the RedList is good for this. Ie, 'won't corrupt your non-spam collection or whitelist' but still has basic content checking (bombre et al) I used to whitelist them (eg .sourceforge.net domain) but some groups are becoming heavily spammed and I don't want them in my corpus. I would still like, however, the attachment, bombre, scriptre etc to take place. Nick ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
