"Fritz Borgstedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy > <[email protected]> schreibt: >>Probably one on a very long list of "cool" features >>to add to ASSP. > > It is *not* cool. The ASSP common whitelist represents a trusted > environment for a group of people and the group gets advantages from > the experiences of groupmembers. The ASSP approach is quite > sophisticated in that.
Agreed. I'm just suggesting that perhaps one day the whitelist could eventually be otpionally configured to represent a trusted environment for a specific group of people, such as a domain. Currently, the ASSP administrator has no control of that group of people. It would be nice to have an additional level of control and be able to control which groupmembers are allowed to provide information. This is obviously not a two-minute solution, but rather something that would have to be thought out first. Maybe a permissions schema where you can specify which members are allowed to contribute to which WL, etc... Just some thoughts.... Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
