Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy <[email protected]> schreibt: >re's an idea I'd like get some comments on, related to my prior post >about APEWS. > >I'd like to weight DNSBL services. I'm thinking something like (1) >two RBLServiceProvider lists: hits on one level would block email and >hits on the second level would score neutral, or (2) a weighting >system, like "zen.spamhaus.org:2|bl.spamcop.net|...", where the ":2" >would count a Spamhaus hit as two hits while SpamCop would be a >normal single hit. Either method would allow DNSBLs with a high >accuracy rating like Spamhaus or UCE Level 1 could block or score >higher than those that are too aggressive like APEWS or UCE Level 3.
This is not possible, because "hits" have a special meaning in our dnsbl handling and can not be converted into your "hit" system. It should be clear, when you read the description what a hit is. Anyway there is a similar way using your notation and things we have already in place. The multiplier in e.g. zen.spamhaus.org:n would only used if the result of the query is "neutral". It would be used to multiply the pb-score. That would mean, that a result of "neutral" with zen.spamhaus.org as the single dnsbl with a hit would produce a pb.score of 25x2=50, which would be blocked by MessageLimit. I am hesitating to anything in this, because with a proper setting, the dnsbl handling of ASSP is doing quite (very,very) well. fritz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
