Really best to start a new thread with a new subject rather than change topics on an existing.
On Thursday, March 03, 2016 04:39:14 PM Raynaud Alexandre wrote: > Hi, > I think you have already explained enough your wish for ASSP development and > it is quite legitimate to express and share. The author has already stated > its views. Its not just mine, its a sentiment that has existed for years, shared by many. Though allot have moved on. Also do not confused developer/maintainer with author. People have taken over development of ASSP, but they are not the original Author, John Hannah. I suspect if they were still around things would have been broken up long ago. I did not put the comments on Wikipedia. I was not part of the past discussion of splitting up ASSP. I do not believe there are many currently contributing to ASSP development. This could be the main reason why. Anyone can participate in the development of ASSP, but I do not believe many other than Thomas are these days. What might the reason be for lack of interest in helping to develop or further ASSP? > So now what else? Wanna push him to do something he doesn't need necessary > to do? This attitude is not rational. Not pushing, Thomas is a volunteer, he will do what he wants, as most volunteers do. But sometimes what one volunteer does can put off others, and limit contributions, points of view, discussion, direction of the project etc. Dictatorship vs community lead project. I believe ASSP is the communities not any one persons, no matter who wrote the code, currently maintains it, or is looking to further it. > If the author doesn't follow your > recommendations, what ever the consequences (- or +), it is his right. In the past this lead to 2 different releases of ASSP. Fritz release and the community. Many projects do fracture or fork. I would not want to see that happen to ASSP. I would also like to see others contributing to ASSP so the entire load is not falling on Thomas. If Thomas gets bored with ASSP and moves on, who will take over? Lucky Thomas remained when Fritz moved on, but if Thomas was not around when Fritz moved on... If you use and depend on ASSP as I have for a long time. This may be of concern. > You > are free to express and share your ideas, free to fork, free to stop using > ASSP, free to involve in ASSP project in the direction the author want to > manage it, free to not accept others decisions but.... It will not change > anything. Anyway thanks for sharing your ideas. Discussion is what brings about change. But again most of these are not coming from me. I am just the one bringing it up in the present. Others brought it up in the past, and have since moved on. That is not good for ASSP, nor its future. Look at how active things were in the past https://sourceforge.net/p/assp/mailman/assp-user/ https://sourceforge.net/p/assp/mailman/assp-test/ -- William L. Thomson Jr. Obsidian-Studios, Inc. http://www.obsidian-studios.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user