On 9 July 2013 18:06, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17 April 2013 15:10, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> On 22 September 2012 09:16, Cedric Blancher
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 17 August 2012 18:23, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 25 July 2012 20:18, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 13 April 2012 20:40, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Has anyone figured out how or if it is possible to use AST mailx to
>>>>>> access Googlemail? Has anyone to share a howto?
>>>>>
>>>>> Five months later... same problem. Same question. Same desperation :-(
>>>>> Can't you just import Heirloom mailx and we're done with Googlemail 
>>>>> support? :)
>>>>
>>>> Six months...
>>>
>>> Seven months...
>>>
>>> Why can't AST just import Heirloom mailx and add libast support on top of 
>>> that?
>>
>> Glenn, the trouble with mailx versus GoogleMail is still happening. Is
>> this bug still on your radar?
>
> Another lost bug.
>
> Glenn, can't AST just import Heirloom mailx and add libast support on
> top of that? Or does AST mailx have special features which warrant
> that it's codebase should still be used despite its lack of working
> IMAP/SSL support (which - in real world - presents the majority of
> mail client users)?

Glenn?

Ced
-- 
Cedric Blancher <[email protected]>
Institute Pasteur
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers

Reply via email to