What would be better is if somebody ported pgksrc to UWIN so that would make installing other free software much easier. It does say on the wikipedia page that work is being done to port it to UWIN.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pkgsrc I checked and heirloom is listed as a supported package: http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/current/pkgsrc/mail/README.html Then having a commercial sponsor pay for the hosting and maintenance of the compiled packages, as well as hosting a bug tracker, etc. On 14 January 2014 08:40, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22 November 2013 16:21, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 9 July 2013 18:06, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 17 April 2013 15:10, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On 22 September 2012 09:16, Cedric Blancher >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On 17 August 2012 18:23, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On 25 July 2012 20:18, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On 13 April 2012 20:40, Cedric Blancher >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> Has anyone figured out how or if it is possible to use AST mailx to >>>>>>>> access Googlemail? Has anyone to share a howto? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Five months later... same problem. Same question. Same desperation :-( >>>>>>> Can't you just import Heirloom mailx and we're done with Googlemail >>>>>>> support? :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Six months... >>>>> >>>>> Seven months... >>>>> >>>>> Why can't AST just import Heirloom mailx and add libast support on top of >>>>> that? >>>> >>>> Glenn, the trouble with mailx versus GoogleMail is still happening. Is >>>> this bug still on your radar? >>> >>> Another lost bug. >>> >>> Glenn, can't AST just import Heirloom mailx and add libast support on >>> top of that? Or does AST mailx have special features which warrant >>> that it's codebase should still be used despite its lack of working >>> IMAP/SSL support (which - in real world - presents the majority of >>> mail client users)? >> >> Glenn? > > Glenn? > > Ced > -- > Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> > Institute Pasteur > _______________________________________________ > ast-developers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers -- Regards Danny _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
