my fault -- I didn't build or post the standalone ksh binary package will rectify tonight thanks
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:42:57 +0100 Janis Papanagnou wrote: > I'm a bit puzzled about the version information of ksh in package > ksh.2010\-03\-09.linux.i386\-64 (with a date one year old!) > While on the notes and changes link I can read > 2011-02-08 > This source release contains the first official ksh93u. > but the shell gives that information on ESC ^V > Version JM 93t+ 2010-03-05 > In the standalone-ksh branch http://www2.research.att.com/sw/download/ > only the package cygwin.i386 seems to have an actual time stamp. > Can you clarify that? > ---------------------------------------- > > Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:56:55 -0500 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [ast-users] AT&T Software Technology ast software download update > > > > the AT&T Software Technology ast 2011-02-08 binary release > > has been posted to the download site > > http://www.research.att.com/sw/download/ > > the notes and changes link has details on the release > > _______________________________________________ > > ast-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users > _______________________________________________ ast-users mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
