On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 14:45, Joe Antkowiak wrote: > >Also, NFS mounting of the voicemail for such a large install is probably > >not the best idea. Unless you really need it available to another > >machine, you _may_ want to rethink this idea. NFS can be a major speed > >hit on a machine, especially if the client is overworked. Also if you > >are planning on running most all the channels to voicemail, then do you > >think you are going to be able to have your NFS server keep high speed > >writing going so as not to slow you asterisk machine down with it's 96 > >channels running full tilt? > > Well, I have to have some centralized way of storing voicemail that all the > * boxes can access. Its either network storage, SAN, or all the * boxes > with t1 cards do IAX to a central * box that will do all the voicemail. I > didn't think I'd have much of a problem getting the nfs box to keep up as > long as its got enough horsepower (dual cpu, gig NIC, serial ata raid 5+1), > and if I do, SAN is the next step... > > What do you think?
I think I am not qualified to answer that question, but you are getting closer to being so qualified now that you are exploring the potential pitfalls. -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
