This is starting to sound like a feature request, perhaps by using the same method that Cisco phones use (comparison using the Via: header, and re-registering if the Via: header is different than the known IP address.)

JT


At 11:02 PM -0700 8/12/03, Terence Chan wrote:

Wasim:


Hi! Thanks a lot for your help. I guess the problem is the REGISTER command.
The <Contact> field is using the local IP address instead of the external
IP.  I am just wondering if it is possible to tell asterisk what is the
external IP so that it can be used for the registration.

Thanks again.

Terence


-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Running Asterisk behind NAT?

Yes, you can run Asterisk behind a NAT.
NO, you CAN'T (reliably, easily) run SIP behind a NAT.
For FWD think about using their behindnat and fwdproxy addresses.
Maybe a STUN would help. Also, test your setup infront of NAT also, make
sure they work, before you head behind a NAT.

--
wasim


This mail is confidential & intended solely for the use of the addressee.


On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Terence Chan wrote:

I would like to ask if it is possible to run Asterisk behind NAT. I have
a
 linksys router that forwarded the port UDP 5082 to the local IP of my
 Asterisk box, I got the error 479 when I try to register my Asterisk box
 with FWD. (see detail below).

Have anyone got Asterisk working behind NAT and successfully registers
with
FWD?

Any pointer or information will be appreciated.
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to