On Sunday 18 December 2005 18:01, Rich Adamson wrote: > Spec sheets are available for the TigerJet 320 pci chipset as well as > the Silcon Labs 3050, 3210 chip sets used on the TDM card. If you dig > through those I think you'll find that it would difficult if not impossible > to change the card's infrastructure since its based on the standards > noted above.
You're still not answering his question. :-) The TJ320 has no buffering capability but the Silabs parts have nothing to do with that, and neither do the framers on the higher-density TDM cards. I think his question is more "why don't these cards have bigger PCM buffers and interrupt less often, or at least have deeper buffers so if an interrupt is delayed I don't get overruns?" I believe the answer lies in latency. You do *not* want deeper buffers. Better interrupt handlers, perhaps, but not any deeper buffering on the hardware, as that just increases latency. -A. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
