I haven't thought it through really, so if it's a bad idea please let
me know. But I think a named pipe would be a good unix-y way to do this.
-Steve Feinstein
A.J. Paxson wrote:
Hi All!
I've really been struggling trying to get around this. Instead of the same
announcement being played over and over again, I want to be able to play
more than 1 announcement in a queue.
Does anyone have any brainstorming ideas on how I can try this?
Once a caller is in a queue, I no longer have any control inside that queue.
I can have that queue timeout, play a different announcement, and place them
back in the queue, but then the caller loses it's place.
Any ideas?
~~Aaron
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/339 - Release Date: 5/14/2006
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
