Did you apply correct "calling search space" on callmanager gateway configuration page for incomming calls from asterisk to callmanager? imho, oh323 is obsolete/unmaintained, I'm using original chan_h323 with callmanager 4.1 and it working fine (including dtmf), ooh323 is probably perspektive and working also, but currently is not working dtmf between callmanager and asterisk (ooh323)
see: http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8191
PJ


Ward, Bill wrote:
I started from scratch again. This time i went with oh323 instead of ooh323.  I 
still get the same issue but this time it says call refused by remote host.  It 
doesn't explain why though.  I can't understand the CCM trace logs to see why 
it might be refusing the connection.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ward, Bill
Sent: Tue 10/24/2006 10:57 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Callmanager 3.3(5) and Asterisk with ooh323
I have tried GSL and ulaw.  tried one at a time.  tried both and even tried 
g729 and g7231.  still same issue.  Unless i am thinking of something different


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Michael Araba
Sent: Tue 10/24/2006 10:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Callmanager 3.3(5) and Asterisk with ooh323
I have experience problems like this in a different scenario. It is
usually due to codec translation problem.

What is the default codec set on CCM for the IP Phone and the default
set in Asterisk? Make sure the defaults are the same. Try G.711

Michael

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to