Ray wrote: > Could anybody give me an authoritative answer on whether > Asterisk can support T.38 pass-through when the clients > are behind NAT? We have Asterisk servicing clients behind > NAT (with nat=route, canreinvite=no) and would love to get > T.38 going but have had no luck so far. The following case:
> http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=7844 Authoritative? Nope. But I'll try to help anyways... 1. t38pt_udptl must be set to yes in [general] in sip.conf > ...suggests that T.38 *does* now work for clients behind NAT > but I have the latest SVN trunk but still cannot get it to work? > On the other side I have seen on this list only 2 weeks or so ago: > http://www.mail-archive.com/asterisk-users@lists.digium.com/msg172556.ht ml > This suggests that T.38 does *NOT* work behind NAT? So, can > anybody save me the trouble and tell me how it is. Am I on a > hiding to nothing trying to get T.38 going with NAT? Please put > me out of my misery! :) Part of an age old issue that doesn't bear repeating, but is also not terribly accurate or relevant. > Cheers, > Ray Capture a debug log of a failed T.38 session and post it on Mantis. Make sure to set: >core set verbose 4 >core set debug 4 >sip set debug Testing and (what little) feedback the developers have received indicate that it SHOULD work with the latest SVN. > PS. Does anybody know whether OpenPBX would support T.38 and NAT > configurations? This was my backup plan if I couldn't get it to go in > Asterisk. No idea. Dan _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
