I cannot think of a single reason to use Fedora for a production anything when there are alternatives like CentOS. Fedora is bleeding edge stuff and constantly changing.
-----Original Message----- From: Matthew J. Roth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 7:39 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Enterprise or Fedora? love U.all wrote: > i wanna build a production Asterisk box ,will RedHat Linux Enterprise > Server be more stable than Fedora core Linux or it makes no > significant difference I started out running Fedora, but I have migrated away from it for a few reasons. Fedora has a very short life cycle and since the demise of the legacy project there is no support for releases that are over a year old. It is also considered a bleeding-edge distribution and is a testing ground for new applications and features. As such, it has frequent updates (including the kernel) that aren't guaranteed not to break your system. If stability and long-term support are your goals, I recommend taking a look at CentOS <http://www.centos.org/>. It is a binary-compatible clone of Red Hat Enterprise Linux that's free and has a very long support period. It's basically RHEL without the paid support contract. My migration to CentOS was painless, because the file system and configuration are practically identical to those of Fedora. Regards, Matthew Roth InterMedia Marketing Solutions Software Engineer and Systems Developer _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
