I prefer CentOS barebone install and yumming the way up for dependencies but manually compile asterisk/zaptel . Ubuntu servers are pretty good too since its repositories are quite bigger compared to CentOS .
On Feb 2, 2008 11:45 PM, shadowym <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actively maintained or actively being broken and fixed with constant > updates? Not something suitable for Production IMHO. Makes more sense > for > development and experimentation IMHO. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Benny Amorsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 1:54 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Enterprise or Fedora? > > "shadowym" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I cannot think of a single reason to use Fedora for a production > anything > > when there are alternatives like CentOS. Fedora is bleeding edge stuff > and > > constantly changing. > > The advantage of Fedora is that it is very actively maintained -- and > asterisk is only a yum install asterisk away! > > > /Benny > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
