Actively maintained or actively being broken and fixed with constant updates? Not something suitable for Production IMHO. Makes more sense for development and experimentation IMHO.
-----Original Message----- From: Benny Amorsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 1:54 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Enterprise or Fedora? "shadowym" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I cannot think of a single reason to use Fedora for a production anything > when there are alternatives like CentOS. Fedora is bleeding edge stuff and > constantly changing. The advantage of Fedora is that it is very actively maintained -- and asterisk is only a yum install asterisk away! /Benny _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
