On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Russell Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you want to talk about locking improvements, then I'm more than > happy to talk about them. Naming an application is useless. Let's > talk about the technical details that make one approach better than > the other. > > You have yet to bring any useful discussion to the table.
>From what I can gather the suggestion from the FS approach is that each Asterisk channel should be handled after by it's own unique thread and save the need for any locking on the channel data structures in the first place. Regards, Greyman. _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
