On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Sean Bright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Steve Totaro wrote: >>> There must be a reason.... What is it? >> >> That is the question that *you* are being asked. >> >> A competing project is getting better performance and you believe it has >> to do with locking. What specific changes do you suggest making to the >> locking infrastructure in Asterisk in order to improve it's scalability? >> >> -- >> Sean Bright >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Call me Mr.Obvious, but I propose figuring out why it is faster (and > obviously get FS to sign away any righs). > > Obviously, you did not visit the site enough to understand, or your > retention is lacking. > > Besides that, google is you friend. > http://www.anders.com/cms/266/Asterisk.vs.FreeSWITCH > > Thanks, > Steve Totaro > > Adopt FS's method..... It is like pulling teeth with guys. >
Maybe this will help: http://blogs.zdnet.com/Greenfield/?p=214 Thanks, Steve Totaro _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
